The Second Department recently addressed a trust rescission action in which the plaintiff failed to join certain remainder and charitable beneficiaries as parties. Jaclene D’Agostino explains the Court’s holding in this week’s blog entry.
Continue Reading Action Dismissed For Failure to Join Beneficiaries
Jaclene D'Agostino
Court Cites Flaws in Article 17-A in Denying Guardianship Application

This week, Jaclene D’Agostino discusses a recent decision from New York County that has the potential to substantially impact the future of guardianship proceedings in Surrogate’s Courts.
Continue Reading Court Cites Flaws in Article 17-A in Denying Guardianship Application
Trusts: Legally Protecting Assets from the Settlor’s Creditors

This week, Jaclene D’Agostino discusses the circumstances under which trusts assets are legally protected from the settlor’s creditors.
Continue Reading Trusts: Legally Protecting Assets from the Settlor’s Creditors
Widow Barred from Bringing Legal Malpractice Action against Husband’s Estate Planning Attorneys

This week’s entry, written by Jaclene D’Agostino, discusses a recent New York County Supreme Court decision dismissing a widow’s legal malpractice claim against her husband’s estate planning attorneys. The rationale: lack of privity, despite the fact that the defendant attorneys also represented the widow in her own estate plans, and jointly with her husband in other matters.
Continue Reading Widow Barred from Bringing Legal Malpractice Action against Husband’s Estate Planning Attorneys
Amendments to Simultaneous Death Statute, EPTL 2-1.6

This week’s post discusses amendments to EPTL 2-1.6, the statute pertaining to the disposition of assets in circumstances of apparent simultaneous deaths.
Continue Reading Amendments to Simultaneous Death Statute, EPTL 2-1.6
Probate of a Lost Will

This week’s entry discusses the requirements to probate a will when the original instrument has been lost.
Continue Reading Probate of a Lost Will
Beneficiary Participation Irrelevant to Allocation of Trustees’ Litigation Costs

Legal fees incurred by fiduciaries in connection wtih their stewardship are generally chargeable to a trust or estate as a whole. This week’s blog entry discusses a recent case in which non-objecting beneficiaries sought to allocate trustees’ litigation costs solely to the objecting parties’ interests.
Continue Reading Beneficiary Participation Irrelevant to Allocation of Trustees’ Litigation Costs
Parents of Decedent Have No Rights to Preserved Reproductive Tissue

Parents of a decedent, as administrators of his estate, recently sought ownership rights to the decedent’s frozen sperm specimens in hope of ultimately having a grandchild by a surrogate. The First Department’s decision is explained in this week’s entry.
Continue Reading Parents of Decedent Have No Rights to Preserved Reproductive Tissue
New Power of Attorney Legislation Effective September 1, 2009

Governor Paterson has signed legislation extending the effective date for the new Power of Attorney statute from March 1, 2009 to September 1, 2009. This provides an additional six months to learn about the significant amendments to GOL 5-1501, which were summarized in a previous posting.
Powers of a Nominated Executor to Litigate Prior to the Issuance of Letters

Questions often arise regarding a nominated executor’s authority to commence an action on behalf of the estate prior to the issuance of letters testamentary. These must be answered on a case-by-case basis.
In general, the authority of an executor “is derived from the will, not from the letters issued by the Surrogate” (see Matter of Yarm, 119 AD2d 754 [2d Dept 1986]). Thus, the executor’s duty to preserve estate assets arises immediately upon the testator’s death.
Pursuant to EPTL §11-1.3, a named executor of a will that has not yet been admitted to probate “has no power to dispose of any part of the estate of the testator before letters testamentary or preliminary letters testamentary are granted, . . . nor to interfere with such estate in any manner other than to take such action as is necessary to preserve it” (emphasis added). It is the language of this statute, and the similar words of its predecessor, Surrogate’s Court Act §223, that the courts have used as a guide in determining the circumstances under which named executors without letters may commence actions on behalf of the estate for which they are nominated to serve. Because the statute provides that a named executor may take actions that are necessary to “preserve” an estate, courts’ interpretations of the statute have established a fine line between those actions that are commenced for purposes of preservation, and those that constitute “active management” of estate affairs.
Continue Reading Powers of a Nominated Executor to Litigate Prior to the Issuance of Letters